Yet another weight loss scam

On June 23, 2016 “The Age Green Guide” contained a full page advertisement titled, “Medical Team Discovers How To Reset Hormones For Weight Loss”.

The advertisement featured Dr Thomas Clement Goyer and the Medical Weightloss Institute. Claims included:

“Thanks to the team at GTC Medical and the Medical Weightloss Institute (MWI) Australians can now lose weight without strenuous exercise and counting calories – thanks to a treatment that resets the hormones to burn fat for fuel”.

“I had been overweight my entire life and tried everything. Nothing worked. Then I had a consult with Dr Tom and it changed everything. I’ve lost 42kg now and I honestly feel amazing. I had more energy from day 1 on the program. I tell everyone who will listen; they have to try the Medical Weightloss Institute” says Nazih Hamze from Sydney (32 years old)”.

Similar claims are found at: http://mwiconsult.com.au/

I have submitted a complaint to both AHPRA and the ACCC alleging that this promotion, involving both Dr Goyer and the Medical Weightloss Institute, is misleading, deceptive and exploitative, lacks an evidence base and preys on a vulnerable population, the overweight and obese.

Meanwhile, I note the following report about Dr Thomas Goyer.

http://www.australiandoctor.com.au/news/latest-news/ami-s-impotency-doctors-cogs-in-a-commercial-machi

“Among the AMI doctors who gave evidence was Dr Thomas Goyer. He told the court that the AMI job was not particularly demanding for a doctor “because no one dies of erectile dysfunction” and it was not as “terrible” as it would be to practise as a GP. Although he said the work was repetitious, Dr Goyer was paid $1000 a day. “Dr Goyer did not present as a doctor who was committed to patient care,” the judge wrote, describing the manner in which Dr Goyer presented his evidence as “arrogant, obstructive and unco-operative”.

linkedinrsslinkedinrss
Posted in Weight loss | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Dr Glen Maginness YouTube video and Mt Eliza Family Chiro Clinic Website & Facebook page

On May 30, 2016 Dr Glen Maginness (a Victorian AHPRA registered chiropractor)  published a YouTube video, titled, “Paediatric Chiropractor Hits Back (at medical bullies)!” This link has now been made private but it was copied while in the public domain and is available here.

I have sent a notification to AHPRA about the statements Dr Maginness made in this video which I submit breach both s.133 of the National Law, the Chiropractic Board of Australia Code of Conduct and the Board’s March 7, 2016 “Statement of advertising”. The notification includes a transcript of the video and a detailed rebuttal of the claims made.

My colleague, Malcolm Vickers and I have also submitted an additional eight notifications for all the chiropractors (including Dr Maginness) that practice at the Mt Eliza Family Chiropractic Clinic. We believe that the claims made on the Mt Eliza Family Chiropractic Clinic web site are particularly egregious and show a blatant disregard for Chiropractic Board’s recent “Statement of advertising”.

We accept that the eight chiropractors involved in the Mt Eliza Family Chiropractic Clinic are caring practitioners who genuinely believe that their interventions on paediatric patients are effective. However, belief based on disproven dogma, the selective use of poor-quality evidence, and personal experience subject to bias, is no longer an appropriate basis on which to promote and practice therapeutic interventions.

The Mt Eliza Family Chiropractic Clinic chiropractors (and many others) continue to promote and provide chiropractic treatment for conditions which the Chiropractic Board of Australia has said are unacceptable. This is both an ethical and public health issue and warrants immediate action by AHPRA and the Chiropractic Board.

The Chiropractic Board has recently acted on Dr Ian Rossborough who published a YouTube video that showed him performing a chiropractic adjustment on a new born baby. However, his numerous colleagues, such as the eight Mt Eliza Family Chiropractic Clinic chiropractors mentioned above, who promote (and practice) in the same manner have yet to have similar sanctions applied.

AHPRA’s June 2016 Newsletter notes they are currently dealing with 600 complaints against chiropractors, many relating to their treatment of babies and children. Surely, what is good for Rossborough is good for the lot of them; no chiropractor should practice on children younger than 6 and for kids from 6 to 18 they must all provide evidence to justify their treatments, not just to a “skilled registered chiropractor (the supervisor)” but publically!

linkedinrsslinkedinrss
Posted in Chiropractic, Complementary medicine, Education | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

National Medicines Symposium 2016

Presented a seminar at NMS 2016 in Canberra on Canberra, May 19, 2016 titled “Reinvigorating the regulation of therapeutic goods advertising to consumers” with Agnes Vitry & Barbara Mintzes.

See also: AUST L requirements encourage ‘shonky products’

linkedinrsslinkedinrss
Posted in Complementary medicine, Education, Pharmaceutical Promotion | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

ABC RN background briefing: Chiro wars; Dr Ian Rossborough

The latest media coverage in this long running saga.

linkedinrsslinkedinrss
Posted in Chiropractic, Complementary medicine, Education | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Seminar: The Advertising of Therapeutic Good and Services, March 17, 2016

Introduction

This seminar was held back-to-back with World Consumer Rights Day 2016 (March 15) and the National Consumer Congress (March 16). The latter was hosted by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). The 2016 Congress discussed how to better protect and empower consumers in the lead up to the review of the Australian Consumer Law.

Our seminar’s aim was to outline current concerns that consumer (and health professional) organisations have with the advertising of therapeutic goods and services and explore ways in which the system(s) might be improved.

Organisations that have expressed concern about these matters include the Consumers Health Forum, Choice (Australian Consumers’ Association), Friends of Science in Medicine, Australian Skeptics, the Doctors Reform Society and Stop the Australian (Anti) Vaccination Network.

The seminar was organised and supported by Choice, the Foundation for Effective Markets and Governance (FEMAG), University of Sydney (Health Law Centre), Monash University (School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine) and the ACCC.

Topics discussed

  • The promotion of therapeutic goods to health professionals: Industry self-regulatory codes
  • The promotion of therapeutic goods to consumers
  • Promotion of therapeutic services by registered health professionals
  • Promotion of therapeutic services by unregistered health professionals

The following material is available for download:

 

linkedinrsslinkedinrss
Posted in Chiropractic, Complementary medicine, Education, Natural Therapies, Pharmaceutical Promotion | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Chiropractic Board Media Release on Advertising, 7 March 2016

Chiropractors must ensure their advertising is within the law

The Chiropractic Board of Australia, which regulates Australia’s 5,000 chiropractors, has today released a statement reinforcing that practitioners need to ensure their advertising complies with the requirements of the National Law, or they risk prosecution and disciplinary action. More at:

http://www.chiropracticboard.gov.au/News/2016-07-03-media-release.aspx

Statement on advertising

The Board is very concerned about any chiropractors with advertising (including websites) that may not meet the required standards despite repeated guidance being provided by the Board.

In order to provide further clarity to both practitioners and the public, the Board provides the following clear advice on advertising matters. More at:

http://www.chiropracticboard.gov.au/News/2016-03-07-statement-on-advertising.aspx

Media coverage

My view: The Chiropractic Board’s “Statement on advertising” and “”Media release are welcome as far as they go.

However, there remain hundreds of chiropractor web sites that continue to make the claims identified in the “Statement” (and numerous other claims are made, equally lacking in evidence).

The last five years of “educative” communiques from the Board have had minimal impact on practitioners.  While this “Statement” is more specific than those produced in the past, it still does not identify all the non-evidenced claims complained about (see consolidated list from only ten complaints attached).

In addition, unlike the U.K. General Chiropractic Council and Chiropractic Australia, the Australian Chiropractic Board (and the Chiropractic Association of Australia) has yet to state that,

“The chiropractic vertebral subluxation complex is an historical concept but it remains a theoretical model. It is not supported by any clinical research evidence that would allow claims to be made that it is the cause of disease” (attached).

Claims made about the alleged value of routine chiropractic care for pregnant women, new-born, babies, children and numerous medical conditions are often based on this erroneous subluxation concept. In addition, they clearly increase the practitioner’s business and bank balance.

It’s my view that until such time as the Board and AHPRA penalise and publicise those practitioners for breaching s.133 of the National Law little will change.

Part 7, of the National Law is available to prosecute advertising offenders in the Magistrates Court (maximum penalties available for this statutory offence are $5 000 for an individual and $10 000 for a body corporate).

Part 8 of the National Law is available to sanction recalcitrant practitioners for repeated advertising offences. Penalties available under Part 8 include cautions, accepting undertakings, placing conditions of the practitioner’s registration or, for professional misconduct, referral to a tribunal with the power to impose additional penalties, including a fine of up to $30 000.

Another advantage of using Part 7 and 8 of the National Law is that Court and Tribunal Decisions about individual practitioners are published on the AHPRA web site.

I reiterate, until such time as timely and effective sanctions are employed by AHPRA and the Chiropractic Board, I doubt that significant change will occur.

For previous coverage click here.

 

linkedinrsslinkedinrss
Posted in Chiropractic, Education | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Chemmart’s myDNA test offers more than it can deliver

See: https://theconversation.com/chemmarts-mydna-test-offers-more-than-it-can-deliver-54484

Also: http://www.australiandoctor.com.au/news/latest-news/pharmacies-attacked-for-flogging-$149-dna-testing

linkedinrsslinkedinrss
Posted in Education, Pharmaceutical Promotion | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Victorian government crack down on dodgy health providers

The problem is that until all States & Territories introduce uniform legislation the unregistered Dr Dodgy will simply move and set up shop interstate.

linkedinrsslinkedinrss
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Complaints over IV infusions

linkedinrsslinkedinrss
Posted in Education, Pharmaceutical Promotion | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Chiropractic / AHPRA complaints

An article on this topic published in MJA InSight together with an opinion editorial in Fairfax press has attracted considerable attention (below).

More importantly, it led to a media statement by the Chiropractic Board of Australia on March 7, 2016.

The Advertiser Letters to the Editor, February 3, 2016

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/opinion/the-advertiser-letters-to-the-editor-february-3/news-story/164c973c0eab9698da18c34ca497ceb3

Be accountable

MINISTER Snelling’s demand for answers from the chiropractors’ board and regulatory agency (The Advertiser, 2/2/16) is timely and welcome.

The internet has brought many benefits, but also a massive explosion in the promotion of bogus, pseudoscientific and sometimes dangerous “treatments” that are seldom, if ever, policed. Add the aggressive and overt attempts by various practitioners to make themselves the first person to be consulted by the unwell and their wholesale adoption of the title of doctor, and it is not surprising that many people are confused about what treatments may actually help them.

Friends of Science in Medicine has been advocating for years that those who profit by offering false hope and false treatments should be answerable, and Minister Snelling is to be applauded for taking up the challenge.

PROF JOHN DWYER, AO, President
PROF ROB MORRISON, OAM, Vice-President
Friends of Science in Medicine.

WE applaud Minister Snelling’s support for eliminating the false advertising of health claims in all media and particularly on the internet.

However, the various self-regulating boards of alternative therapists also need to start applying effective sanctions on their recalcitrant abusers. These boards to date have been completely ineffective in controlling nonsense therapeutic claims by their constituency, particularly in the treatment of babies, children and pregnant women.

EMERITUS PROFESSOR ALASTAIR H MacLENNAN, AO,
PROF MARCELLO COSTA,
For Friends of Science in Medicine

linkedinrsslinkedinrss
Posted in Chiropractic | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment