Prof Weerasuriya ( University of Colombo) has complained that ‘Australian made’ skin whitening products are being sold in Sri Lankan supermarkets (and presumably other Asian counties).
Skin-whitening products are a multi-billion-dollar industry that push a racist idea that beauty equates with white skin and that lightening dark skin is achievable and preferable. This concept fuels intolerance of dark-skinned people, causes serious social harm and wastes consumer’s money.
The ‘Facia Premium Skin Lightening Formula’ is being illegally exported by an Australian company (Zifam Pinnacle) and as a skin whitening product. That is not a permitted or specific indication on the TGA’s ARTG product public summary (295927). This promotion brings Australia’s reputation into disrepute. It’s also an indictment of uncritical Australian export awards (below).
A complaint has been submitted to the TGA and to the Hon Karen Andrews MP, Minister for Industry, Science and Technology.
Regrettably, the Minister, and her Department of Industry, Science and Technology, has a track record of prioritising industry profitability over consumer and social justice concerns, see: Made in Australia?
Prof Weerasuriya from Sri Lanka comments:
- There are many skin whitening products on the market, including from giant multinationals such as Unillevers. They occupy significant shelf space in supermarkets.
- There is no scientific evidence that any of them work as promoted.
- As Medicines Regulator I can see the clear discrepancy. The manufacturer obtains an Australian licence number for the product (which does NOT have skin whitening as an approved indication). The manufacturer then adds “skin whitening” claim as on the outer packaging when exporting – that is a violation of the Australian licence number regulations.
- The National Medicines Regulatory Authority in Sri Lanka is also lax – information is available on the Internet and the discrepancy can be pointed out but the product is registered and allowed into the country.
- The importer then sells the product with all the “Australian Prestige” misleading the consumer.
- Action needs to be taken on multiple points in the supply chain – publicity in the Australian media would help in cutting off the product at its source.
———- Forwarded message ———
From: TGA Advertising <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 15:14
Subject: Outcome of advertising complaint – AC-1J8YT9YX/2020 – Contract Manufacturing & Packaging Services Pty Ltd – CC-W69HC3ZY/2020* TGA-CM:0138001 [SEC=OFFICIAL]
To: Ken Harvey <email@example.com>
Dear Dr Harvey
Your complaint AC-1J8YT9YX/2020 received on 27/01/2020 in relation to the advertiser, Contract Manufacturing & Packaging Services Pty Ltd (Case Ref. CC-W69HC3ZY/2020*) for the advertising of Facia, Facia Men and Facia Premium has been finalised.
Although this complaint was found to relate to advertising, the TGA was unable to take further action as this advertising falls outside of the TGA’s jurisdiction. The TGA has not referred this matter to another agency for investigation as the advertising is occurring outside of Australia.
Thank you for bringing this matter to the attention of the TGA. Kind regards
Advertising Compliance Section
Therapeutic Goods Administration
Department of Health
PO Box 100
Woden ACT 2606
From: Kenneth Harvey <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020, 9:31 am
Subject: Re: Outcome of advertising complaint – AC-1J8YT9YX/2020 – Contract Manufacturing & Packaging Services Pty Ltd – CC-W69HC3ZY/2020* TGA-CM:0138001 [SEC=OFFICIAL]
To: TGA Advertising <email@example.com>
Cc: Dr Krisantha Weerasuriya <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Although this complaint was found to relate to advertising, the TGA was unable to take further action as this advertising falls outside of the TGA’s jurisdiction.
First, have the TGA’s GMP inspectors visited Contract Manufacturing & Packaging Services Pty Ltd, 20 – 22 Long Street, SMITHFIELD, NSW, 2164, to observe whether these products and their packaging are being made in Australia? If they have, is this still outside TGA jurisdiction?
Second, I note that Facia Premium is currently being advertised by an Australian company, ebay.com.au, registrant: ebay Australia and New Zealand Pty Limited, ABN 22086288888 with an indication ‘Skin Lightening Formula’ (and name) that is not on the ARTG public summary document for AUST L:162708 and no required warnings.
See: https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/FACIA-PREMIUM-30-CAPSULES-WOMEN-AND-MEN-FREE-SHIPPING/164333029306 (appended)