Typically, the Morrison government has provided indemnity for vaccine manufacturers but not Australians who are at risk of the exceedingly rare, but sometimes fatal, blood clots linked to the AstraZeneca vaccine.
A no-fault vaccine injury compensation scheme recognises that if the government promotes whole of community vaccination for collective good, then it should also accept the ethical and financial burden for the few people who will sustain a severe injury.
Many other countries have such schemes, including the UK, US, New Zealand, and Canada, why not Australia?
From The Age, Letters to the Editor, 14/04/2021, Dr Ken Harvey
- Global landscape analysis of no-fault compensation programmes for vaccine injuries: A review and survey of implementing countries
- All for one and one for all: no-fault compensation for vaccine reactions
- Ending the vaccine blame game: time for a no-fault compensation scheme
- Bad reactions to the COVID vaccine will be rare, but Australians deserve a proper compensation scheme
- Who pays compensation if a COVID-19 vaccine has rare side-effects? Here’s the little we know about Australia’s new deal
- No-Fault Compensation for Vaccine Injury — The Other Side of Equitable Access to Covid-19 Vaccines
- Vaccine injury compensation programmes
- Comparing AstraZeneca vaccine blood-clot risk to odds of dying in a car crash unhelpful, experts say
- Is it the adenovirus vaccine technology, used by AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, causing blood clots?
- What is thrombocytopenia, the rare blood condition possibly linked to the AstraZeneca vaccine?
- Doctors do not face a greater legal risk if they give AstraZeneca to younger Australians — here’s why
- Covid-19: Rare immune response may cause clots after AstraZeneca vaccine, say researchers
- No change to vaccine advice for older Australians after woman’s death ‘likely’ linked to AstraZeneca jab
- COVID-19 Vaccines: Talk to U3A Melbourne City – (medreach.com.au)
- COVID-10 Vaccines: Update Talk to U3A Melbourne City – (medreach.com.au)